by Susan Cann on March 29, 2012
[Since when are baby products considered suitable subject matter for "Fashion & Style"? From the March 28 The New York Times Fashion & Style section]:
Methinks a lot of the personal care product (over)pricing issues (and ethical issues) are stemming from the cosmetic industry’s massive marketing campaigns. It’s not about beauty, it’s about keeping our bodies, and our babies’ bodies, clean & comfortable. If we got off the anti-aging, Youth Rules bandwagon, the industry would have a lot less emotional control over moms’ heart (and purse)strings.
by Susan Cann on November 26, 2011
A group member wrote:
“Is the world ready for this view? There is more to looking youthful and feeling attractive when you learn to tap into your inner anti-ageing power. It’s also about fulfilling an inner potential.”
And I responded:
There is more to looking **your age** and feeling **self-acceptance and self-confidence** when you learn to tap into your inner **knowledge of your place within nature.** It’s ALL about accepting your past, living in the present, and acknowledging that aging and death are all part of life.
I have no desire to stay “youthful” and I think “anti-aging” is a crock devised by cosmetic manufacturers to sell more product to insecure women who don’t feel “beautiful” unless their skin is untouched by time. I want to be healthy, and enjoy every stage of life I am in. I enjoy aging, I have creative energy, and I’m feeling much mellower now that I have more years of life experience. If wisdom was revered in our culture, wrinkles would be considered… “beautiful.”